Real SEO Isn’t About Tricking Search Engines | Renegade Search

Renegade Search

At Renegade Search, we provide business owners and marketing managers with the information and insights they need to clarify, measure and achieve their digital marketing goals. 
Follow Us on Twitter for more great tips and insights!


Real SEO Isn’t About Tricking Search Engines

The Onion has been one of my go-to websites for years. I can’t think of a single site on the internet that can leave me giggling like a mad man, week in and week out. And although their headlines, stories, and news skew towards the completely ridiculous, they more often than not raise very legitimate points through their satire.

And although they tend to focus on political and cultural stories, they’ll occasionally touch on some biting media criticism. (See their hilarious issue dedicated to living through the five stages of grief for not winning a Pulitzer for an excellent example.) But in today’s world, it isn’t possible to discuss the media without touching on SEO.

So last week, they released an article titled “This Article Generating Thousands of Dollars in Ad Revenue Simply by Mentioning New iPad”. In the indirect manner that is the Onion’s specialty, the article is a pretty devastating critique of modern media business models. And although it doesn’t mention the phrase ‘search engine optimization’, it does raise issues of how certain people try to use (and abuse) SEO.

As the headline suggests, the point that the article is making is that simply mentioning a high-profile and popular term in a headline can drive traffic (and thus higher ad revenue) to news sites. In the text of the article itself, the criticism runs deeper: because the only thing that matters for the business model is using the words “new iPad” in the headline, the rest of the article can be total fluff. So unimportant is the actual content that the author is fine with concluding the piece with: “At press time, new iPad, new iPad, new iPad, new iPad, new iPad, new iPad, new iPad, new iPad, new iPad, new iPad”.

The article is a great critique of sites called ‘content farms'; places like eHow that solely exist to attract search traffic for trending terms and grab some ad dollars along the way. Thanks to their business models, these sites care only about maximizing the traffic they get, and have little to no incentive to actually create content that is of use to anyone.

To be blunt, I hate these sites. I think that they are polluting the web, and making it harder for users to find any valuable content. And even worse, their continued existence is tarnishing the reputation of search engine optimization.

I’ll be the first to admit that the people who run these sites are absolute masters of SEO; they have a knack for knowing what people will be searching for, and how to show up in search results for those terms. If they didn’t have these skills, their sites wouldn’t be successful, and I wouldn’t be writing about them.

But just because they have been successful at SEO doesn’t mean that they should be emulated. Nor does it mean that their particular brand of ‘forget about the user SEO’ is all that search engine optimization can be. And most importantly, their models should most certainly not be followed by any site that is relying on anything other than ad revenue.

This is all to say that there are many different purposes for doing SEO. Frankly, some of these border on get-rich-quick schemes. Too often, I’ve seen people try to use SEO solely to ‘get rankings’ or to increase traffic. Which is good enough if the goal of the site is simply to get people to click on advertisements.

But this is only a small part of what SEO actually is and can be. For sites that are looking for deep engagement, churning out fluff pieces rarely serves any purpose whatsoever. The real goal of legitimate SEO isn’t to increase traffic or ad revenue, but rather to help sites connect with engaged and active audiences. For most sites on the web, the best marketing goal is to help people who want to find a product; be it information, an ecommerce page, or a lead form. It’s about connecting people, not tricking search engines.

Steve Anson
Steve Anson

Let's be honest Tim, the overwhelming majority of folks involved in SEO are looking for a shortcut to achieve their marketing goals. They're not thinking first and foremost about creating great content for the user (which is exactly want Google wants website/blog owners to think about). SEO has become too complicated and frankly, a zero sum game. I'm in the mood to refocus all my (potentially wasted ) SEO resources on content and trust that increasing audience engagement will take care of everything else. Am I naive?


Hi Steve, Thanks for your comment! I can definitely see where you're coming from. You're absolutely right about the unfortunate reality of how far too many people think of SEO is some kind of magic trick that can use shortcuts to achieve success. And given that, it's completely reasonable that you might get frustrated and just not spend any resources on your SEO campaigns. But I think that'd be an example of throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Even though Google, Bing and other search engines really do want to promote high-quality, engaging content, there is still a very real need for SEO on your sites. Unless you invest the resources needed to make sure that your site is completely discoverable and readable by the engines, you won't get very far. At the end of the day, you should balance SEO with content creation and reader engagement. The two go hand-in-hand when it comes to promoting your business. If you're interested in learning more about how you can effectively use multiple techniques simultaneously, you might want to check out this post.

PDF Download "7 Important Tips for Choosing an SEO Agency"
Get More Free SEO Tips in our DTC Monthly Newsletter

Sign up for our monthly newsletter where we share tips on search engine optimization, pay per click advertising, local search optimizing, and other tactics to improve your online presence.