<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Rolls Out Longer Meta Description Snippets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-rolls-longer-meta-description-snippets/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-rolls-longer-meta-description-snippets</link>
	<description>Improving The SERPS One Day At A Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:48:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xander</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-rolls-longer-meta-description-snippets/comment-page-1#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Xander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/?p=175#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t leave all your meta descriptions blank, Google relies on them heavily to differentiate between pages.  Plus you&#039;ll avoid unnecessary errors in your Webmaster Tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t leave all your meta descriptions blank, Google relies on them heavily to differentiate between pages.  Plus you&#8217;ll avoid unnecessary errors in your Webmaster Tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preben Frenning</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-rolls-longer-meta-description-snippets/comment-page-1#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Preben Frenning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/?p=175#comment-169</guid>
		<description>This is nice for relevancy, but like you said, it will make adwords ads stick out more as advertising for the users, hence they might not click it, and it will decrease the ctr of your campaigns. - And make them more expensive. 

Nice for content-packed websites that focus on organic search traffic, but bad for advertisers.

 - Preben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice for relevancy, but like you said, it will make adwords ads stick out more as advertising for the users, hence they might not click it, and it will decrease the ctr of your campaigns. &#8211; And make them more expensive. </p>
<p>Nice for content-packed websites that focus on organic search traffic, but bad for advertisers.</p>
<p> &#8211; Preben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Pabich</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-rolls-longer-meta-description-snippets/comment-page-1#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Pabich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/?p=175#comment-168</guid>
		<description>It should be added that if using AdWord, and especially broad match keywords, these types of queries could still trigger paid search attempts for any match type.  I applaud Google&#039;s effort here, but on the other side - still  beware of broad match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be added that if using AdWord, and especially broad match keywords, these types of queries could still trigger paid search attempts for any match type.  I applaud Google&#8217;s effort here, but on the other side &#8211; still  beware of broad match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
