<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Renegade Search &#187; Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/category/search-engines/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog</link>
	<description>Improving The SERPS One Day At A Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Instant and SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-instant-seo</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-instant-seo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Marco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Google held its much-hyped press event unveiling Google Instant at the Museum of Modern Art in San Francisco. Featuring pandering to the arts crowd, an exposition on the history of information retrieval, the most awesomely-named Googler ever, and even product demonstrations, the event raises a ton of questions for SEOs. Most importantly, many SEOs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-instant-seo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Badda &#8220;Bing&#8221;&#8230;Fuggeddaboutit!</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/badda-bingfuggeddaboutit</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/badda-bingfuggeddaboutit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Zlatin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you haven&#8217;t heard Microsoft recently launched their new search engine called &#8220;Bing&#8221; earlier this week.  This is their 3rd attempt at stealing some search market share from Google and honestly I think it&#8217;s going to fail&#8230;again.
I&#8217;m not saying that the new Bing search engine is a poor attempt by any means.  I think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/badda-bingfuggeddaboutit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Google Referral String Will Allow You To See Rankings in Analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-referral-string-rankings-analytics</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-referral-string-rankings-analytics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Zlatin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google recently announced that they will be making some changes to their referral string format which will be rolling out this week.
The old url referral string looked something like this:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#38;q=flowers&#38;btnG=Google+Search
The new one will look something like this:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#38;source=web&#38;ct=res&#38;cd=7&#38;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.com%2Fmypage.htm&#38;ei=0SjdSa-1N5O8M_qW8dQN&#38;rct=j&#38;q=flowers&#38;usg=AFQjCNHJXSUh7Vw7oubPaO3tZOzz-F-u_w&#38;sig2=X8uCFh6IoPtnwmvGMULQfw

There seems to be a lot more data in the new URL string but one of the main improvements [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-referral-string-rankings-analytics/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canonical URL Tag&#8230;Good or Bad for SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/canonical-url-tag-good-bad-seo</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/canonical-url-tag-good-bad-seo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Zlatin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big news in the SEO world folks&#8230;.Google, Yahoo and MSN have recently announced that they will be respecting and following what&#8217;s known as the &#8220;Canonical URL Tag&#8221;.  This new tag  (if it works) allows you to avoid duplicate content issues by letting the search engines know which pages are duplicate and which are the preferred [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/canonical-url-tag-good-bad-seo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Market Share 2008: Google Grew, Yahoo &amp; Microsoft Dropped &amp; Stabilized</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/search-market-share-2008-google-grew-yahoo-microsoft-dropped-stabilized</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/search-market-share-2008-google-grew-yahoo-microsoft-dropped-stabilized#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Zlatin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landing Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/search-market-share-2008-google-grew-yahoo-microsoft-dropped-stabilized</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Danny Sullivan over at Search Engine Land has posted some new search engine market share figures&#8230;Google gained another 6% in search market share in 2008!  What? Are you surprised?
What&#8217;s even more interesting is that Google&#8217;s profits are rising as well, even in this bad economy.  Microsoft, which has never ever had massive layoffs in it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/search-market-share-2008-google-grew-yahoo-microsoft-dropped-stabilized/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paid Links Not Mentioned In Google&#8217;s Webmaster Guidelines???</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/paid-links-mentioned-googles-webmaster-guidelines</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/paid-links-mentioned-googles-webmaster-guidelines#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Zlatin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/paid-links-mentioned-googles-webmaster-guidelines</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just read through all of Google&#8217;s Webmaster Guidelines and noticed there was no mention of avoiding paid links.  Hmmm&#8230; Do you think they simply forgot to mention this in their popular guidelines for webmasters?  This is the page they tell webmasters to read if they are having ranking problems or for those who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/paid-links-mentioned-googles-webmaster-guidelines/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome &#8211; A Web Browser With a Silver Lining?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-chrome</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-chrome#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Zlatin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-chrome</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In their ongoing quest to dominate the universe, Google has announced that they are coming out with their own web browser called Chrome. Interesting news considering they were so &#8220;in bed&#8221; with Firefox before.  It was a win win relationship for Google and Firefox but now it doesn&#8217;t look like that relationship will continue [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/google-chrome/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuil Not So Cool Quite Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/cuil-cool</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/cuil-cool#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Cimala</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/cuil-cool</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the buzz going around about the new up and coming search engine, Cuil (pronouced &#8220;cool&#8221;) we obviously had to kick the tires a bit to see how this bad boy would drive. As CNN reports, Cuil was created by ex-Google engineers, and who better in the business to drive the technology behind a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalthirdcoast.net/blog/cuil-cool/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
